Back to programs
Icon
Attendance grades studied

K-12

SaferSanerSchools Whole-School Change

Essa Rating
promising
No. Studies
1
No. Students
8940
Average Effect Size
Average daily attendance: +0.07; Chronic absenteeism: +0.05

Program Description

The SaferSanerSchools™ Whole-School Change program is disseminated though the International Institute for Restorative Practices (IIRP). It is grounded in 11 essential elements that center around the importance of communication, responsibility, restoration, and separating the “deed” from the “doer.”  It requires all school staff to learn how to enact the key elements with an aim of increasing understanding of how one’s actions affect others and more broadly creating a better school climate.

Program Outcomes

In a Pittsburgh (PA) study by Augustine et al. (2018), 44 schools were randomly assigned to the SaferSanerSchools™ Whole-School Change program or to a control group. Implementation was over 2 years. Results were not significant at the school level but were significant for both average daily attendance (effect size = +0.07) and chronic absence (effect size = +0.05) at the student level, qualifying SaferSanerSchools™ for the ESSA “Promising” category.

Staffing Requirements

Schools are required to designate a team of at least three members (administrator, interventionist, and teacher) who meet monthly.

Professional Development/Training

School-based teams attend two days of training prior to program start and have access to ongoing technical support via email communication.

Technology

No technology required.

Implementation Notes

Surveys and interviews with teachers and staff from the Pittsburgh-based study (Augustine et al., 2018) indicated general satisfaction with most program components. Survey ratings were significantly more positive in participating schools than in comparison schools for conduct management, teacher leadership, school leadership, and overall teaching and learning conditions. Teachers also reported that they had stronger relationships with students because of restorative practices. An overall study conclusion was that the program’s positive impacts on teachers’ perceptions of teaching and learning conditions were strongly supported.